MEGAN HUGHES questions whether we judge female athletes more on the way they look rather than on their ability on the field.
Lent Term sees the emergence of fervent Cambridge loyalty revived, as many of the University’s sports teams clash against their mortal enemies, their opponents from The Other Place, in a series of Varsity matches.
As this partisan fever sweeps the faculties, so students find themselves exposed to increased coverage of sporting endeavours and achievements. For those who represent the University in their sport of choice, this is is a refreshing and encouraging phenomenon, as are the reports of success for men and women alike which flood our student newspapers.
It seems, however, that such a phenomenon also reveals a darker side of student culture. Last week, I wrote a report on the Cambridge Women’s Football Team’s emphatic victory over their Oxford counterparts in the League, an achievement which both exceeded expectations and sent out a strong message ahead of their Varsity game. Whilst I was encouraged by congratulations from those friends who tendentially remain wholly unconnected from the world of football, I was disheartened to see that the first comment on the article was one which swept aside the players’ success, and instead focused upon the appearance of one girl.
The comment, since removed, suggested that the offending party had taken a particularly vulgar liking to one footballer shown in the picture, though not in so many words. Admittedly, it was crude, base, and demonstrated a complete absence of wit on the part of the commenter, yet that doesn’t detract from the fact that it was made. It angered me that some oafish troll had taken it upon themselves to crack a joke, at the expense of a team who had grafted hard to pummel Oxford. It might have been coarse and unintelligent, but ultimately the fact that the comment ostensibly had the power to undermine such a brilliant victory left a sour taste in my mouth.
CUWAFC, exhausted after their Varsity win on Saturday
It’s not simply one off-hand comment, either. On its own, such a remark wouldn’t be particularly damaging, but it reflects the harmful culture which seems to characterise the modern attitude to sport in this country. As athletes gain public acclaim, so they begin to blur the lines between celebrated sportsperson and celebrity. It is perhaps this trend within popular culture, of regarding successful athletes as superheroic, and of transferring them from the realm of sport to that of celebrity culture, which has engendered an increasingly common phenomenon: the judgement of athletes based upon the aesthetic, rather than sporting prowess.
The most distinct manifestation of such a trend came to the fore during the Olympics last summer. Jessica Ennis was not only an Olympic gold medallist in the heptathlon, but ran the 110m hurdles in a time which would have seen her clinch gold four years earlier in Beijing, a seismic achievement. Yet whilst the public bowed down to her triumphs on the track and field, she drew another crowd of admirers. It was this contingent which created the Facebook page ‘Jessica Ennis Bum’, now boasting an astonishing 125,000 likes and counting. This born in mind, it seems apt that we pose the question of whether all public recognition is a positive force, particularly in the case of physical appearance.
Jessica Ennis winning the 800m in the London Olympics
It would be foolish to argue that we shouldn’t judge others based upon physical appearance; it’s a fundamental and instinctive characteristic of human nature. More than this, I can already imagine people pointing out that, surely, any appreciation of somebody’s beauty can’t be a negative concept. Perhaps it can’t, in itself. Yet we live in a writhing, organic society whose members are all cyberly inter-connected, and neither remarks nor events can be viewed in isolation. If it becomes acceptable, even conventional, to scrutinise attractive athletes on the grounds of their aesthetic, it will inevitably become the norm to criticise those who are less conventionally good-looking on those very same grounds.
Athletes often sacrifice a lot to reach the top of that game, not solely in terms of commitment, but often in terms of appearance. Whether it be a Cambridge Rugby Blue with cauliflower ears or a female weight-lifter competing at world-level, modern athletes commonly develop corporeal and facial features which distinguish them from the established ‘ideal’ aesthetic of beauty. What gives us the right to condemn them for such physical differences? Pretty much nothing, in my book. Even in those instances where sportspeople are admired for their looks, an ostensibly positive assessment, such a judgement is symptomatic of the noxious streak in contemporary British sporting culture.
I know this argument isn’t going to be particularly popular, it’s going against the grain, but then I wouldn’t be writing it if it weren’t. I also know that there are many Cambridge students who don’t adhere to the cultural trend that I’ve discussed, who most probably make up the majority. It just seemed a shame that a place like Cambridge could harbour such injurious attitudes; in an ideal world, whenever we read about a Blues victory, we’d be more likely to applaud their achievement on the pitch than their appearance off it.
Fit to Compete?
MEGAN HUGHES questions whether we judge female athletes more on the way they look rather than on their ability on the field.
CAMBRIDGE
Lent Term sees the emergence of fervent Cambridge loyalty revived, as many of the University’s sports teams clash against their mortal enemies, their opponents from The Other Place, in a series of Varsity matches.
As this partisan fever sweeps the faculties, so students find themselves exposed to increased coverage of sporting endeavours and achievements. For those who represent the University in their sport of choice, this is is a refreshing and encouraging phenomenon, as are the reports of success for men and women alike which flood our student newspapers.
It seems, however, that such a phenomenon also reveals a darker side of student culture. Last week, I wrote a report on the Cambridge Women’s Football Team’s emphatic victory over their Oxford counterparts in the League, an achievement which both exceeded expectations and sent out a strong message ahead of their Varsity game. Whilst I was encouraged by congratulations from those friends who tendentially remain wholly unconnected from the world of football, I was disheartened to see that the first comment on the article was one which swept aside the players’ success, and instead focused upon the appearance of one girl.
The comment, since removed, suggested that the offending party had taken a particularly vulgar liking to one footballer shown in the picture, though not in so many words. Admittedly, it was crude, base, and demonstrated a complete absence of wit on the part of the commenter, yet that doesn’t detract from the fact that it was made. It angered me that some oafish troll had taken it upon themselves to crack a joke, at the expense of a team who had grafted hard to pummel Oxford. It might have been coarse and unintelligent, but ultimately the fact that the comment ostensibly had the power to undermine such a brilliant victory left a sour taste in my mouth.
CUWAFC, exhausted after their Varsity win on Saturday
It’s not simply one off-hand comment, either. On its own, such a remark wouldn’t be particularly damaging, but it reflects the harmful culture which seems to characterise the modern attitude to sport in this country. As athletes gain public acclaim, so they begin to blur the lines between celebrated sportsperson and celebrity. It is perhaps this trend within popular culture, of regarding successful athletes as superheroic, and of transferring them from the realm of sport to that of celebrity culture, which has engendered an increasingly common phenomenon: the judgement of athletes based upon the aesthetic, rather than sporting prowess.
The most distinct manifestation of such a trend came to the fore during the Olympics last summer. Jessica Ennis was not only an Olympic gold medallist in the heptathlon, but ran the 110m hurdles in a time which would have seen her clinch gold four years earlier in Beijing, a seismic achievement. Yet whilst the public bowed down to her triumphs on the track and field, she drew another crowd of admirers. It was this contingent which created the Facebook page ‘Jessica Ennis Bum’, now boasting an astonishing 125,000 likes and counting. This born in mind, it seems apt that we pose the question of whether all public recognition is a positive force, particularly in the case of physical appearance.
Jessica Ennis winning the 800m in the London Olympics
It would be foolish to argue that we shouldn’t judge others based upon physical appearance; it’s a fundamental and instinctive characteristic of human nature. More than this, I can already imagine people pointing out that, surely, any appreciation of somebody’s beauty can’t be a negative concept. Perhaps it can’t, in itself. Yet we live in a writhing, organic society whose members are all cyberly inter-connected, and neither remarks nor events can be viewed in isolation. If it becomes acceptable, even conventional, to scrutinise attractive athletes on the grounds of their aesthetic, it will inevitably become the norm to criticise those who are less conventionally good-looking on those very same grounds.
Athletes often sacrifice a lot to reach the top of that game, not solely in terms of commitment, but often in terms of appearance. Whether it be a Cambridge Rugby Blue with cauliflower ears or a female weight-lifter competing at world-level, modern athletes commonly develop corporeal and facial features which distinguish them from the established ‘ideal’ aesthetic of beauty. What gives us the right to condemn them for such physical differences? Pretty much nothing, in my book. Even in those instances where sportspeople are admired for their looks, an ostensibly positive assessment, such a judgement is symptomatic of the noxious streak in contemporary British sporting culture.
I know this argument isn’t going to be particularly popular, it’s going against the grain, but then I wouldn’t be writing it if it weren’t. I also know that there are many Cambridge students who don’t adhere to the cultural trend that I’ve discussed, who most probably make up the majority. It just seemed a shame that a place like Cambridge could harbour such injurious attitudes; in an ideal world, whenever we read about a Blues victory, we’d be more likely to applaud their achievement on the pitch than their appearance off it.
CAMBRIDGE
St John’s College Cambridge now has control over the SJV choir’s social media
CAMBRIDGE
The petition to save the mixed choir is supported by the former archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams
Cambridge University temporarily halts funding from fossil fuel companies
CAMBRIDGE
A report found that donations from oil and gas companies posed a ‘high reputational risk’ for the university
Eight cafés to try in Cambridge as a student before you graduate from university
CAMBRIDGE
Spoiler alert: Fitzbillies isn’t the only coffee shop in Cambridge
St John’s College Cambridge mixed choir is being disbanded
CAMBRIDGE
The decision means female sopranos will no longer be able to sing in any chapel services
Cambridge University colleges as songs with women’s names in the title
CAMBRIDGE
Get ready to update your playlist immediately x
Cambridge reading week – yay or nay?
CAMBRIDGE
All this reading isn’t for the weak
Cambridge men lose on penalties at the 150th anniversary of Varsity football
CAMBRIDGE
Cambridge was forced to substitute its goalkeeper following an injury on the third minute
THE RESULTS: Cambridge vs Oxford women’s football 2024
CAMBRIDGE
A short summary of the Varsity match for those of you who know nothing about football
Cambridge’s smallest pub has reopened after four years
CAMBRIDGE
Here’s everything you need to know about The Rad, a tiny pub on King Street
Review: Blackadder Goes Forth – Cambridge Does Comic Relief
CAMBRIDGE
A performance that did justice to the much-loved British comedy
Paint thrown over Cambridge University West site building in protest of its ties to Israel
CAMBRIDGE
Cambridge’s Laboratory for Scientific Computing has been under fire for its links to arms companies
A moral alignment ranking of Cambridge college rowing blade designs
CAMBRIDGE
Totally objective (based on free speed and vibez)
A definitive ranking of Cambridge stash from ugly to just about wearable
CAMBRIDGE
It’s me and my puffer against the world
THE REVEAL: Cambridge’s Top 10 BNOCs 2024
CAMBRIDGE
Never have I ever kissed a BNOC…
Review: Emma
CAMBRIDGE
An Austenite’s dream! (and Jane’s own nightmare)
Who are the candidates running for election at the Cambridge Union?
CAMBRIDGE
Voting opens Thursday 7th March after the weekly debate
Leading ladies: Cambridge’s best female alumnae
CAMBRIDGE
In honour of international Women’s Day
Review: Neighbourhood Watch
CAMBRIDGE
Nothing bad happens in suburbia…right?
Cambridge students organise protest against Trinity College’s ties to Israel
CAMBRIDGE
The action comes after Trinity was issued a legal notice asking it to divest from its investments in arms companies
The highlights and lowlights of Cambridge Lent Bumps 2024, as told by Rowbridge posts
CAMBRIDGE
Forget CamFM and WC, Rowbridge has all the coverage you need
Omg, Gypsy Rose Blanchard and her husband Ryan SPLIT just three months after her release
UK
Clearly the ‘D’ wasn’t that fire after all
From Mini Eggs to Creme Eggs: What each Russell Group uni would be as an Easter egg
UK
Waitrose pistachio egg is big Oxford energy
Build your perfect Easter chocolate haul and we’ll tell you what percentage Tory you are
UK
£30 hand-painted bespoke egg? Do one
Just a bunch of memes about how bad the guys of MAFS Australia 2024 have been this week
UK
If you don’t laugh, you’ll cry
Love Island’s Hannah kicked out of Molly Smith’s Boohoo event for vaping inside too much
UK
‘She was arguing in the street with bouncers’
As well as his hate list, Ben wrote Ellie a ‘game plan’ and threatened to leave MAFS Australia
UK
‘You have three to five days left, be kind’
Sara EXPOSES Jack for flirting with her and ‘grabbing her butt’ on MAFS Australia
UK
She was made to feel ‘extremely uncomfortable’
Inside the wholesome Traitors cast weekend away where Diane had the fizzy rosé flowing
UK
Not Charlie getting into a hot tub fully clothed
Love Island All Stars couple Jess and Callum have SPLIT after huge public rows
UK
‘He was seen partying with another blonde’
Jono secretly admitted he wished he was married to Ellie and called her ‘hot’ during MAFS
UK
Despite insisting they were ‘just friends’
MAFS Australia production got so angry at Ben his friends and family visit was edited out
UK
Ben would ‘constantly speak in riddles’ and production ended up ‘yelling at him’ over it
Um, MAFS’ Timothy’s claiming Ben ‘stole’ his lyrics for the hell on earth Ellie apology song
UK
Is anything normal happening on MAFS Australia at this point?
The MAFS Australia experts revealed their fave cast members and the choices are wild
UK
Alessandra is a real one
MAFS Australia alumni Jesse reveals which 2024 couples he thinks are in fake relationships
UK
I’m actually so shocked
Two weeks after split from Adam, Love Island’s Arabella is dating a Premiership footballer
UK
She has a type!
MAFS Australia set to be rocked by a HUGE cheating scandal involving Jono and Ellie
UK
They were secretly messaging each other throughout MAFS
Ranking all of Sydney Sweeney’s roles by how hard they slayed
UK
She ate her Immaculate performance up and left no crumbs, nun at all
In full: The letter MAFS Australia’s Ben wrote to Ellie listing all the things he hates about her
UK
It includes her vaping, and waking up when he walks into the bedroom
Omg, Jayden and Eden ‘agreed to be puppets’ to get more airtime on MAFS Australia
UK
‘Producers told them they needed to cause drama or go home’
Tori and Jack are charging fans a whopping $118 for a MAFS Australia meet and greet?!
UK
You couldn’t pay me to shake his hand
Selling Sunset agent Chelsea Lazkani files for divorce from her businessman husband
UK
He’s the father of their two young children