Durham Law academic claims Liam Allan rape allegations were not ‘false’
She says that the case was dropped due to police errors
A Durham Law academic has come under fire for claiming allegations against Liam Allan were not necessarily false.
Hannah Bows, a criminal law assistant professor at Durham University and local magistrate, sparked a furious debate on Twitter after tweeting the BBC Breakfast Breakfast to say Allan's case had been dropped due to police errors, and that there was "no evidence" suggestion the allegation was false.
The Criminology student's trial fell apart in February last year after texts from his ex-girlfriend were discovered, one of which said: "It wasn't against my will or anything."
Hi @BBCBreakfast, you referred to the ‘false’ allegation of rape against Liam Allen as part of your story this morning on disclosure in police investigations into rape. There is no evidence the allegation was false. The case was dropped due to police errors #responsiblereporting
— Hannah Bows 🐶📚🎓👶🤱 (@Hannah_Bows) April 29, 2019
The Durham academic attracted comments from Liam Allan himself, who said: "The case was dropped due to the text messages disproving the accusation entirely.
"The fact it was dropped so late was because of the police errors."
The case was dropped due to the text messages disproving the accusation entirely? The fact it was dropped so late was because of the police errors. The content of the messages I can't talk about due to legal restrictions, hope that helps with understanding though 👌
— Liam Allan (@liam_allan95) April 29, 2019
Bows quickly responded, saying the evidence was unsatisfactory. She added: "Evidence casting doubt is not the same as conclusive proof that an allegation was false.
"I hope that helps with your understanding."
Evidence casting doubt is not the same as conclusive proof that an allegation was false. I hope that helps with your understanding.
— Hannah Bows 🐶📚🎓👶🤱 (@Hannah_Bows) April 29, 2019
Others on Twitter, including lawyers and solicitors, have been quick to disagree with Bows's comments.
Jerry Hayes, the prosecution barrister for the original trial, said he offered no evidence because "the withheld evidence showed that the allegations were false."
Criminal solicitor, Nicholas Diable said: "It is an established fact that the case was dropped because messages were found in which the complaint made clear the sex was consensual."
Not so. The case was dropped because the withheld evidence showed that the allegations were false. That’s why I offered no evidence https://t.co/0Ftuq8PlSx
— Jerry Hayes (@jerryhayes1) April 29, 2019
Barrister David Hughes claimed Bows's comments were defamatory and could cause grounds to sue for libel.
Bows eventually suggested that a rape allegation should not be described as false unless the claimant has actually been charged or convicted of making false allegations.
She said: "My point still stands – she has not been found guilty of making a false allegation. There is no conclusive evidence she made a false allegation.
"I am been told (sic) I am implying the defendant in this case is guilty. Actually, I am stating the victim should not be described as/implied to be a liar/making false allegations when this has not been proven."
He has confirmed what we already knew – that the evidence weakened the case and there was no longer a realistic prospect of conviction. My point still stands – she has not been found guilty of making a false allegation. There is no conclusive evidence she made a false allegation
— Hannah Bows 🐶📚🎓👶🤱 (@Hannah_Bows) April 29, 2019
The responses to this are incredibly predictable. I am been told I am implying the defendant in this case is guilty. Actually, I am stating the victim should not be described as/implied to be a liar/making false allegations when this has not been proven. Simples. https://t.co/6T7M95cJDU
— Hannah Bows 🐶📚🎓👶🤱 (@Hannah_Bows) April 29, 2019
Liam Allan has appeared in national news again this week, after police revealed plans to ask all rape accusers to hand their phones over for police examination.
The proposal has been introduced after a number of rape cases, including Allan's, fell apart because of last-minute evidence, but has been condemned by campaigners who say it will act as a "deterrent" for victims.







